Re: Feeling inadequate....
I don't see what you did wrong- you checked the heart rate before giving the dig, she was on tele, and even though you said her rate slowed for a brief moment, it came right back up & you continued to monitor it. I agree- probably vaso-vagal. I wouldn't have called the doc unless the rate went down & stayed down for more than a couple of minutes.
Re: Feeling inadequate....
0.25mg iv digoxin...seems like a lot, especially if the patient even had a brief period of bradycardia, and already had 3 doses--especially if it was long enough for the tele nurse to have mentioned it to you. i've seen 0.25mg given as first dose and then following doses tapered. i don't think that you did anything wrong, but considering the dose, and that brady episode, i may have held it until md had time to do rounds and r/a. i know we can think for ourselves as nurses and it seems so easy in hindsight. i remember i had a tele patient i gave dig to after taking apical/radial pulse >80 but the tele nurse who was covering for breaks forgot to mention to me about a brady period earlier. i was really upset, because if i had known that beforehand i would have definitely held the dose until seen the md on rounds. oral dig is given at 14:00 so that would have given me lots of time to check with md. (i've even held meds, even when the doctor say to go ahead and give it--ie., atenolol or sotalol with hr 58-60) i was lucky in my case the patient went brady but was asymptomatic. unfortunately in your case they had to go to the unit. take it easy on yourself. sounds like the unit isnt very well coordinated with poor communication between tele nurse and floor nurse.
Re: Feeling inadequate....
Geez!
I know this post is old but what a terrible way to treat the traveler. I agree that this hospital has a serious problem with how they monitor patients and hand off communication. This writer indicated that the patient remained asymptomatic and the bradycardia wasn't significant nor was it sustained. No specific mention was made about the blood pressure but I'm sure it was adequate given the rest of the reported findings. This patient sounds fragile and would require close monitoring anywhere. I think the traveler was very vigilent and did nothing wrong. I'm sure that were the telemetry history to be researched, it would be discovered that those brady episodes were occurring all along with or without Dig. As was suggested by another reader, due to the GI symptoms, the patient was likely experiencing vaso-vagal stimulation which would account for an increase in the frequency of bradycardia irrespective of the Dig. I wonder if the ICU nurse assessed the patient and reviewed the meds and telemetry history before making the derisive Dig. comment. Finally, the doctor's behavior was ridiculous and transferring the patient to the unit seemed punitive. How was this action to benefit the patient? Was there a change in her treatment plan that could only be carried out in the unit? Is there some prophylactic paint on the walls there that prevents flatlining? Give me a break!
Joperry, if you're still out there, I'd advise you to dust off your heels, take your Bordeaux and chocolate and go to another place where your diligent nursing care would be appreciated.
R