Originally Posted by
The unexplainable Moo Cow
I was doing some reviewing from a textbook regarding staffing issues in nursing. One plan to resolve the nursing shortage was to increase the pay rate for RNs and thus bring the supply and demand into balance. The book cited a pay increase in 2003 of 8.3% above the 2002 average reflecting “the acceleration in the demand for RNs” that occurred the previous 2 years (Contemporary Nursing issues, trends & Management, p. 272).
“Historically, nursing shortages have lasted 3 to 8 years and have been followed by periods of equilibrium or surpluses of similar strength…According to projections, cumulative real wage growth between 2002 and 2016 would need to exceed 55.4% to substantially affect the abatement of the shortage.” (Contemporary Nursing issues, trends & management, p.272)
1. Let us assume the by the year 2016 the shortage has been met. New grad RNs would have a starting pay in the mid $80,000 range equivalent for today -- if my calculations are correct – let alone the year 2016. Where does that money come from and how will it be sustained to avoid another critical shortage?
2. What happens to the standards of practice and care if the shortage is not met and many of our instructors retire? A different theory and practice of RNs? More ancillary staff with more responsibilities? If there are not enough “mothers” to lay “eggs”…well, you get the point. We’ll just have to reinvent the wheel.
3. What does this mean for nursing unions? If the demand is met, will we see more unions? If the shortage is as bad as predicted, will there be enough RNs to make the unions? What about “mandatory overtime”?
While I welcome the pay increase, I loathe the idea of lower standards of practice and more stress.
Just some thoughts.