Stallone backs use of HGH

13 posts · started Jan 26, 2008

BeachyCEN Jan 26, 2008, 11:05 PM
People will convince themselves of anything to try and make it true. He is kidding himself, but more he is sending a very bad message to a lot of kids and others...are we really that surprised?

~KelRN24

Life is better at the beach!
cougarnurse Jan 27, 2008, 6:49 AM
I remember one kid in High School nearly getting HGH, as he was nearly 16 and hadn't grown. But at whatever age this guy is? And all for a career? Yeesh! And what about future problems? If he's taken it before, can it affect his kids? BTW....doesn't his one son have some problems?
BeachyCEN Jan 27, 2008, 2:58 PM
He is 61 I think and obviously not too smart! How many athletes have died or suffered brain tumors and the like due to steroids and other 'enhancement performing' drugs? Again, great example...


~KelRN24

~ Panic plays no part in the training of a nurse. ~ Elizabeth Kenny
Aaron C. Jan 28, 2008, 7:56 AM
I tend to disagree with you guys a little bit on this one.

HGH is a lot different than steroids.

There's a built in bias against it because of steroids and really, you can't quite classify it as a steroid.

I think if used properly, HGH has many "potentially" valuable properties.

I've read a lot of articles on the topic. Some people use it in very small amounts every single day and have for years without any ill effects.

When abused or used improperly of course you are going to see serious problems, but that goes for all drugs.
BeachyCEN Jan 28, 2008, 4:56 PM
Valid point...but I really thought is was used for people with growth (pituitary) disorders, not body building. I still think he is sending the wrong message. I don't think anything is gained without a little hard work :)

~KelRN24

Life is better at the beach!
cougarnurse Jan 28, 2008, 5:38 PM
That is true, Kel. You have it, or you don't. And at 61? Oh, I know that '40 is the new 30', but it may all boil down to the movie/money/etc.

Aaron, I see you mention 'potentially' valuable properties. However, we are not sure what. If anything should happen due to use of the HGH, it may not be directly linked yet.
cassioo Jan 29, 2008, 2:51 PM
I think people should stop listening to celebrities since they aren't the experts they claim to be ie: exercise, diet, fashion, medicine, child rearing, mental health, money matters, marriage etc etc etc.
Sylvester Stallone has been hit in the head too many times
BeachyCEN Jan 30, 2008, 1:27 PM
Very interesting! I sure as heck would not want to take it; not unless it was absolutely necessary. :)

~KelRN24

Panic plays no part in the training of a nurse.
Elizabeth Kenny
SoldierNurse Jan 30, 2008, 2:28 PM
I tend to agree with Aaron on this subject. If, HGH is used, which I never have, under a licensed MD and the individual has lab work done on a regular basis I see nothing wrong with such. LOL, people smoke cigarettes [I don't], which are legal, but have very serious health risk.

BTW, I'm definitely a Sly fan & admirer. Plus, my wife loves the Rambo character. She hates the fact I'm not with her to go see the movie.
Ricu Jan 30, 2008, 6:30 PM
Not sure what to make of this. On one hand, HGH has certain useful medical benefits for people who have conditions which cause them to have difficulties while trying to live an ordinary life. On the other hand, it has certain benefits which aid ordinary people to live superordinary lives. Is this bad or good? For the record, being one who enjoys a fitness program including weightlifting for ALL of the benefits, I struggle with people who want to fast-track the work of bodybuilding just for the "look". I suppose all is fair but it ain't right!

R