Korea Signs Deal to Send 10,000 Nurses to US

13 posts · started Apr 22, 2006

nursinghumor Apr 22, 2006, 10:40 PM
Korea Signs Deal to Send 10,000 Nurses to US:"Officials from South Korea and the U.S. held a signing ceremony Thursday to celebrate a deal that will take 10,000 nurses from Korea to the United States over the next five years.
To ease the shortage of nurses in the U.S., New York’s St. John’s Riverside Hospital, which operates a nursing school and supplies nurses to 100 hospitals, has arranged for Korean nurses who wish to do so, to begin one and a half year internships that could lead to full-time employment."
http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200604/kt2006042017521611990.htm

If our own colleges can't graduate enough nurses, and we can't convince enough people to go into nursing, suppose we'll need to get nurses from somewhere, huh?

Andrew Lopez, RN
A to Z Nursing Resources
http://www.nursinga2z.com
kimmiejs Apr 27, 2006, 1:32 AM
As long as they live up to the standards set by the ANA and that there there will be no pressure to lower licensure standards in order for these nurses or any others to receive a nursing license in the USA, I do not see what the problem is. From what I have read approximately 75% of all hospital vacancies are for nurses. By the year 2020 the U.S. will experience a 20% shortage in the number of nurses needed in our nation's health care system. This translates into a shortage of more than 400,000 RNs.
That is something to think about.
nursinghumor May 1, 2006, 6:21 PM
It's more than something to think about, it's a critical issue that needs to get dealt with.

Most of us know and have seen what shortstaffing, too long shifts and burned-out nurses do to our quality of life and the quality of care we can give to our patients.

Many complain now that our working conditions endanger patient care. What are we going to be saying when 20% of our workforce retires with no hope of replacements. When the babyboomers hit the hospitals, nursing homes and start filling up hospital beds, who's going to be there to care for them? To care for us?

I can see why some are pressuring the licensure boards to lower standards. It's a very dangerous situation.

Andrew Lopez, RN
A to Z Nursing Resources
http://www.nursinga2z.com
wilyum4u2 May 12, 2006, 8:00 PM
I am not quite buying this nursing shortage thingy,,, i really think that it is all hype by the Hospital and nursing facilities to make the public think that there is one.. How can there be one if every solitary nursing school in the country has a waiting list to get in? Seems strange to me.. but my second thought is that they can pay cheaper wages to the Koreans than American nurses. Just like they did with the Phillipino nurses until they got wise. Now they are using Koreans hmmmmmmmmmm. How come we do not have investigations into these dealings, what advocates from the business owned hospital corporations are supporting the politicians throughout the country? We need to stand up and get this dilema resolved and investigated. Subserviance to this matter is not an option, especially your hard earned education , working hours , continued education, and behaviors from patients that we endure make us good nurses and good nurses to come,, please can the powers that be out there hear us?
nursinghumor May 21, 2006, 6:59 AM
Judging by the number of nurses I talk to who can't wait to get out of bedside nursing, a shortage isn't hard to fathom at all. Add to that the fact that most nurses today are baby boomers, and you can picture how many will be leaving the field how soon.

The waiting lists are due to a shortage of nursing faculty (average age 53), not enough slots to keep up with/replace nurses leaving the field.

The situation is going to get a lot worse in the years to come.

Andrew Lopez, RN
A to Z Nursing Resources
http://www.nursinga2z.com
jenalberta Jun 10, 2006, 5:37 PM
Hi, I am a new member here. I feel very strongly that the criteria to enter into nursing must be changed. The current criteria is too focused on academic performance. In Canada, namely Alberta, the current cut off for acceptance into nursing is in the 90% range. Just because someone is great academically, does not translate into him/her becoming a good nurse. I have met some very smart nursing students who were cold, rigid, and had a personality not condusive to nursing. I certainly wouldn't want them performing bedside care on me, however, they would be fabulous in a lab or research, making great contributions to advancement in health care. And, on the other hand, I have met declined prospective students who didn't "cut the grade", but who would have made caring, humorous, genuinely kind nurses. Just my thoughts,

Jen:)
nursinghumor Jun 14, 2006, 4:36 AM
The strict educational requirements are the only reassurance we have that the nurses that meet them will be qualified to provide safe patient care.

I'd be strongly against, lowering the educational standards. With the growing shortage of nurses, the temptation is going to be there. I believe it would be a major mistake and lead to unqualified nurses and unsafe patient conditions.

Andrew Lopez, RN
Nursing Associations, Jokes, Scrubs & More
http://www.4nursing.com
Ricu Jun 27, 2006, 3:09 AM
nursinghumor wrote:Korea Signs Deal to Send 10,000 Nurses to US:"Officials from South Korea and the U.S. held a signing ceremony Thursday to celebrate a deal that will take 10,000 nurses from Korea to the United States over the next five years.
To ease the shortage of nurses in the U.S., New York’s St. John’s Riverside Hospital, which operates a nursing school and supplies nurses to 100 hospitals, has arranged for Korean nurses who wish to do so, to begin one and a half year internships that could lead to full-time employment."
http://times.hankooki.com/lpage/nation/200604/kt2006042017521611990.htm

If our own colleges can't graduate enough nurses, and we can't convince enough people to go into nursing, suppose we'll need to get nurses from somewhere, huh?

Andrew Lopez, RN
A to Z Nursing Resources
http://www.nursinga2z.com


Short term gain for long term loss...

I'm afraid that this will not fix the problem at all and will in fact, make other problems worse. Let me share a personal experience. Back in the 1980s, I was living in New Jersey where the hospital that I was working at made a decision based purely on its own labor economics and contracted a number people from the Philippines and Mexico to fill various hard to fill positions among them, nursing. The nurses had Baccelaureate degrees, were highly skilled and spoke excellent English while the rest were unskilled and largely illiterate. I have no detailed knowledge of the contract specifics like PTO, insurance, tuition reimbursement, etc. but I know they were all paid below the standard payrate in exchange for various other endowment programs, ESL classes, naturalization and housing assistance and so on. Regardless, just immigrating and becoming naturalized citizens made them eligible for federal endowments. What eventually happened was the new immigrants who were living in subsidized group homes, facilitated the move of their relatives, many of whom remained in the US, illegally. Consequently over twenty years later, this town, my home town, still suffers with a large illegal alien population with all of the associated problems like high crime rates, homelessness, community service dependency and much more. Meanwhile, the original contractors moved on, the hospital decided that it's experiment was a failure, and stopped importing from the third world when it still had staff retention problems. Reflecting on this personal experience, I would say with confidence, that the "New Deal" proposed by Saint John's Riverside is a set up promising disasterous outcomes. The risk is great for a reoccurrance of what happened in New Jersey. I believe it's the "grass is greener" concept for the Koreans just like it was for the Filipinos and Mexicans in New Jersey. From their national perspective, I imagine that coming here is very appealing. Let them live here without public and/or private assistance, earning nurses wages, paying our cost of living and they will find that gloss will soon be gone. I am convinced that they will only be happy for as long as the "assistance" continues. Let's stop trying to fix the problem like it's a local issue when it's national and requires national attention. Because healthcare is regulated at the federal level, any meaningful change will start there. A step in the right direction might be if schools operated by places like New York's Saint John's Riverside Hospital would design programs for and offer job incentives and financial assistance to underemployed US citizens who could likely make the transition more rapidly. Additionally, these people are already citizens, are well aware of our national issues and are already living with them. This school is in a position to fix problems that already exist while avoiding the creation of new ones. It will promote healthcare at least regionally, bring people to the workforce and ease the social burden of supporting underemployed or unemployed citizens that are stuck in the system. Many of whom are dislocated workers who are college educated. No, I am not prejudiced against immigrants. I am prejudiced against bad decisions.

Been there, done that, got the tee shirt and hated it.
Ann RN Jul 19, 2006, 4:19 PM
nursinghumor wrote:The strict educational requirements are the only reassurance we have that the nurses that meet them will be qualified to provide safe patient care.

I'd be strongly against, lowering the educational standards. With the growing shortage of nurses, the temptation is going to be there. I believe it would be a major mistake and lead to unqualified nurses and unsafe patient conditions.

Andrew Lopez, RN
Nursing Associations, Jokes, Scrubs & More
http://www.4nursing.com

I am insulted by this post. I graduated from a 3 year diploma program that had "strict educational requirements". in addition it had more on-hands clinical than any BSN program I have ever seen. We did OR rotations. Our ICU rotation was 6 weeks. Our instructors were always in our units with us. I do not consider this to be "lowering the educational standards". You do not need a BSN to be a good bedside nurse.
Aaron C. Jul 20, 2006, 11:47 PM
Ann RN wrote:I am insulted by this post. I graduated from a 3 year diploma program that had "strict educational requirements". in addition it had more on-hands clinical than any BSN program I have ever seen. We did OR rotations. Our ICU rotation was 6 weeks. Our instructors were always in our units with us. I do not consider this to be "lowering the educational standards". You do not need a BSN to be a good bedside nurse.

Ann,

I agree with what you are saying, but I think there may be a bit of personal bias in your post.

I also agree with what nursinghumor said. Here's why I believe you are both right...and this is coming from an LPN, so I may be biased as well...

There is no reason to lower the educational standards because we already have classes filled up. For LPN's I would like to see the standards RAISED. I would rather be filling those spots up with those whose academic performance was the most impressive.

That does not mean though, as you pointed out, that the "learning method" needs to be changed in favor of a more academic approach.

In fact, I think that nurses who are recieving a bachelor's degree in nursing should actually get MORE HANDS ON TRAINING.

From my experience, a lot of new grad nurses who just recieved their bsn are somewhat lost when it comes to hands on patient care, especially if they got their degree online. THAT IS NOT TO INCLUDE ALL, or even the majory, just a good number of them from MY experience.

That's fine, if they intend on working outside of patient care. If they're working the floor at your local hospital, that may not be so good.

There is of course, the issue of LPN's having less experience on the academic side of things.

I firmly believe that the system is broken and in need of repair.

I can get my bsn online with very little in class time and very little actual clinical experience.

A person opting for LPN school right out of high school could have his/her "certificate" or whatever it is they call it that they give us...in 12 months and if they took a couple of college classes in high school and a little summer school they can be a semester away from attempting to earn their bsn online through the University of Pheonix or whatever.

Let's say they get that in 18 months. You have a 21 year old kid with a bsn in nursing and ZERO EXPERIENCE. Sure, this may be the extreme, but from my experience, EDUCATED, EXPERIENCED NURSES are hard to come by.

One of my classmates didn't turn 18 until well into LPN school. She had her BSN by 21. She's a smart girl, and probably a pretty good nurse, because she really cares, and would take that kind of dedication just to finish that early, but she still lacks experience to do the job that she will SURELY be thrust into...

I'm an LPN, but I'm not afraid to say it, there are a lot of really, REALLY uneducated LPN's out there. There are no real educational requirements to enter into an LPN program other than hs diploma or equivalent. I don't want to stereotype here, but in this case, I think it's fitting in many cases.

Also, I know that there is pressure on the educators of technical schools to pass students and from experience I know that the instructors will go to great lengths to keep a student from failing.

This is far different from a University setting where you're on your own and you don't get any second, third, or fourth chances.

That being said, some of the best nurses I've ever worked with (in my VERY limited experience) are LPN's. My preceptor was an LPN and one of the most knowledgeable nurses I have been around.

I'm rambling on here I know, and probably making some people angry, but that is not my intention.

If I'm ever in the hospital, I only want three people taking care of me. Terry Cooper, Connie Bates, and Lisa Blosser. Two RN's and an LPN and the first is my mother. I'd be SCARED TO DEATH to be in the hospital. And that's the honest truth.

I would not want a nurse that I don't know taking care of me.

Now, I have met quite a few other nursing website owners, and I KNOW that they all know what they are doing from our conversations, and I would trust them as well, but most of them aren't working in the traditional nursing role.

I don't do it, and there's a reason for it.

Those who do it, are nearing retirement age, and the fact is there simply aren't enough nurses WILLING to replace them and that will continue to be the case.

Bringing in foreign nurses, no matter how qualified, is only going to decrease the quality of patient care and worsen the situation creating a false sense of stability.

There WILL BE a communication barrier, and it WILL CAUSE PROBLEMS. There are simply no two ways around it. No amount of experience and dedication can overcome the barriers presented by inability to effectively communicate and disseminate information from Doctors, Patients, and fellow nurses. It's hard enough translating doctor's orders when English is your first langauge let alone when you've learned it as a second langauge for your career. It simply won't work.

Okay, I'd better stop before I get stoned to death!

I am sorry if I offended anyone. It certainly was not my intention. I very well could be wrong about everything I just posted. It's simply my opinion based on my very limited experiences and I am certainly open to hearing any dissenting opinion and to changing my school of thought.

--Aaron

ps.

Go here: Nurse Jobs
and search for a job
Travelingrnnurses Sep 16, 2006, 8:57 PM
It does concern me! I like the shortage due to the fact my $$ go up. As for bringing the Korea nurses here its for one purpose only, keeping your $$ down. The ANA has NO idea what kind of nurses are being brought in. I spoke to the ANA a couple of years ago when the hospital I was at brought 20+ RN's that could not speak English and to beat that were NEW GRADS. The ANA said that it had been agreed that all nurses brought in could speak English and had at least one year experience. NOTHING was done by the ANA. My feelings are that the ANA is owned by the Hospital association. Its time to UNITE. Teachers got nothing until they ALL joined one union!